mycolts.net

connecting colts fans around the world





ChicagoFleen Blog

The Lucas Oil Roof (7 Ratings)


I would like to start this blog by saying that in theory the roof at Lucas Oil was an amazing idea. It would give the Indianapolis fans the experience of having an outdoor game in a climate controlled environment. It also helped attract the Super Bowl to Indy as well.

That is where my praise ends however because in the real world the roof is a terrible idea for the football team on the field. This last sunday the roof was open and made a large impact. Jamie Silva and Pierre Garcon lost the ball in the sun and it could have cost us a turnover (lucky that it didn't) and it DID cost us a touchdown (still got 3 out of it). I have also noticed some sun problems in preseason games as well.

You might ask why that is such a big deal. Here is why. The colts used to have the best homefield advantage of any team in the NFL. The RCA dome was the loudest place I have ever been too. There were never any problems with climate (Indy's weather SUCKS), crowd noise (always loud), or sun. With Lucas Oil I would argue that all of those are trouble spots for us. When the roof is open it dampens the sound of the crowd, has weird sun spots, and probably uses a significant amount more of energy to keep the place heated/cooled.

SO, what is the point of opening the roof? That is the question I put to you. I have been to games with it opened and closed and actually prefer it closed. It is louder and it doesn't affect play. The only negative to keeping the roof closed is the window that faces Indy. I think that is the coolest thing in any stadium in the NFL. It is awesome, but some sacrifices have to be made to make sure the Colts still have the best homefield advantage in the NFL.

GO HORSE.


Comments

leggers wrote re: The Lucas Oil Roof
on 11-6-2009 1:11 PM

Let's be honest the Lucas Oil stadium doesn't look anything like an outdoor stadium, and the only reason we're even bringing up this topic is due to its design. The roof limits entering light, which causes the amount of light that does enter to be intense and disruptive.

It's even disruptive to watch on TV! As you watch games you can notice the light's intensity because the rest of the stadium is in shadow. If the stadium did not have vertical walls blocking radiant light, it might not be an issue, however it created an issue for both players and fans as we are all debating its functionality right now! It seems the roof was designed for an indoor stadium as an option for "outside" atmosphere. Where this roof would be exceptionally enjoyable during night games, and cloudy days, it is lacking during the day...

coltdomination wrote re: The Lucas Oil Roof
on 11-6-2009 12:54 PM

One thing I have noticed since the venue change is that commentators don't really talk much about the fan noise like they used to. They do notice when Peyton goes to work and the Lucas Oil gets eerily quiet. But I can't remember seeing the crowd noise effecting game play like it used to at the dome.

Teams complained about it. I think someone Pats fans or maybe someone in their camp accused us of feeding the noise through the loud speakers. I have seen opposing teams burning timeouts and having false starts and delay of game calls because they can't communicate with their team on the line.

Guess we just have to get louder!

coltstoolman1810 wrote re: The Lucas Oil Roof
on 11-5-2009 7:12 PM

Some days where it is really sunny the roof should have been closed I think.

soonercolt wrote re: The Lucas Oil Roof
on 11-4-2009 9:10 PM

The same subject was already talked about in the forums. I have plenty of replies on that thread. Keep the roof open all year. : )  Football was meant for the outdoors.

TrueblueinPA wrote re: The Lucas Oil Roof
on 11-4-2009 3:46 PM

I have been to open stadiums and domes. Both have advantages for the game and watching experience. I loved the noise in the RCA dome though......

robc317 wrote re: The Lucas Oil Roof
on 11-4-2009 3:35 PM

I think all the griping about the roof being open and costing the Colts plays and points is ridiculous. Yes, the sun got in the eyes of Silva and Clark and affected those plays, but it just happened to be unfortunate for the Colts and sheer dumb luck that it didn't wind up affecting the 49ers at all. The only time the 49ers were in that end of the field in the 1st half when it would've been a factor was when Frank Gore was finishing off his 64-yard TD run.

I can't tell you how many times in September or October that I wished the roof of the RCA Dome could've been peeled off like a sardine can to let the nice weather and sun shine in. Conversely, I love that I've never had to sit outside in the cold and sleet and wind and rain and feel miserable. I remember one December game when I was sitting about halfway up in the upper deck where I could actually hear the sleet and snow start falling on top of the RCA Dome roof. The drive home after that game took 4 times longer than normal and I had to stop 3 times to knock the ice of my wiper blades. No way am I going to complain about not having to sit in that nasty weather.

Now, we have the best of both worlds. We can open the roof on nice days, and be sheltered from the weather on cold and wet days. And unless I'm mistaken I believe the window has been closed even though the roof was open twice this season, perhaps due to the wind-tunnel effect that can be created when both are open. I think Polian said on his radio show that this was a strategic decision made by the team, so they're already using the new stadium to their advantage to a degree. Bottom line, the conditions on the field are the same for both teams. The Colts gained some new knowledge about how the shadows fall in the stadium once DST ends, and will probably use it to their advantage in the future.

Let's enjoy the amenities we have in the new stadium and use them to our advantage rather than whining about it like a bunch of children.

CrazyCaliColtFan wrote re: The Lucas Oil Roof
on 11-4-2009 1:19 PM

OH you forgot to mention Dallas Clark missed a possible Touch Down cause the sun..... thats HUGE

CrazyCaliColtFan wrote re: The Lucas Oil Roof
on 11-4-2009 1:18 PM

This is a second thread on this subject I think... anyhow I'm with Chicago .. CLOSE it for strategical reasons......

Weve got the technology lets use it ;)

bdiddy84 wrote re: The Lucas Oil Roof
on 11-4-2009 12:50 PM

Sunday was the first time watching a pro football game outdoors, it was a great experience. But I listened to Dallas Clark on a morning radio show. He preferred that the Colts would play better at the RCA Dome because the Colts fans helped the team gain the greater advantage. I strongly agreed with him. The loudest Colts game that I've been to was the 2007 AFC Championship against the New England Patriots. That game was CRAZY!!! As long as the Colts fan atmosphere at Lucas Oil Stadium is the same as it always has been and will always be, then everything will be just fine.

truebluecoltsfan wrote re: The Lucas Oil Roof
on 11-4-2009 9:33 AM

I love the roof open and have been in the sun these past games.  I've heard the recievers in general prefer the roof open (vs. the angle of the brigher lights...see www.reggiewayne.com).  I think over time the Colts may be able to gain significant advantage over visitors that don't play here as much...they will know when to win coin toss and defer to pick sides to their 1 quarter advantages and perhaps even how to design plays that leverage the sun and shadows will be in particular situations to their advantage (don't seem to have done that yet though).

tammy1970 wrote re: The Lucas Oil Roof
on 11-4-2009 7:13 AM

In the section I sit in the sun is in our eyes the first Q, but I do like it when its open, I love the fly overs. We went to TN last year and it was in the high 20's and it was cold but once I got into the game it didn't bother me like I thought it would

ereeper wrote re: The Lucas Oil Roof
on 11-4-2009 5:37 AM

I think you mean if the lose the coin toss or defer.  If they win and receive the ball, the kicking team gets to decide which way the want to kick.

Colts12thManBill wrote re: The Lucas Oil Roof
on 11-4-2009 4:10 AM

Don't underestimate Colts management and the designers of the stadium. The layout of the stadium and the design of the roof were done with home field advantage in mind. The parts of the roof that open really only redirect the noise back into the crowd, and the crowd absorbs all those sound waves. The parts that don't open are the ones that direct the noise toward the field where it counts. What we hear in the stands is not what the players are hearing on the field. Also, if you look at the stadium on a map, you will notice that the field runs NNE to SSW. That keeps the sun in the eyes of the opponents bench for the majority of the day. There will be times when the sun is a factor in  the games, but If the Colts win the coin toss, they decide which team is affected.

bash1638 wrote re: The Lucas Oil Roof
on 11-3-2009 6:46 PM

I love that the Colts can play outdoors.  I understand your points, but football is played outside in most NFL cities.  Therefore, the Colts players should not be affected by the weather.  Princeton Tiger hit the nail on the head.  

dede1978 wrote re: The Lucas Oil Roof
on 11-3-2009 6:42 PM

It was pretty cold in there this past Sunday.  I could see the sun was in the players eyes.  I guess there are pro's and con's to it.  Go Colts!!